Ad
Schaerlaeckens Story's
(
STRAINS, NAMES AND EYES" )
When
somebody in Holland or Belgium races outstanding the result
is that foreigners who are after good birds get interested in
the pigeons of such a man.
And the first question the champion in Holland and Belgium has
to answer is: 'What strain do you have?' 'What strain?' The
champions in Holland and Belgium often do not understand.
'What does this man want, a strain or a good bird?' they wonder.
This is not strange because the majority of the superbirds in
Europe are products of crossings! Moreover the question may
rise if 'pure strains' really exist? In my opinion they don't.
HOFKENS:
Take the late Mr Hofkens and his so called strain. Hofkens is
a great name,
especially in America. He was a butcher and lived close to me.
He was of an older generation but still we were kind of friends.
That's why he asked me twice to organise an auction for him.
That was when he was still alive of course. Because of my activities
for these auctions I am pretty well informed about his birds,
his results and the origine of his birds. Well, Mr Gust Hofkens
himself did not believe in a strain and never wanted to have
one. Later, after his death, others would show off with 'strain
Hofkens;
If
Hofkens would be able to read the publications about him and
'his strain' which appeared after his death he would turn in
his grave. In America, and not only there, they claim to have
Hofkensstrain pure whereas Hofkens himself never even thought
of keeping a family 'pure'. He was always looking for better
birds.
He bought pigeons wherever he could provided they were good
and preferably from racers in his own area. Because the pigeons
he wanted were those from people who beat him in the races.
When Hofkens died his birds were totally auctioned. How popular
they were is shown by the fact that some days before the auction
took place part of the birds was stolen despite a policeman
guarded them they and night.
I still have
the auctionlists. They show that about one third of his birds
were 'imports', so pigeons he got from other people, birds which
did not even wear a ring from Hofkens. Another third he bred
off of birds he imported. And pigeons with parents and grandparents
bred by Hofkens himself? He hardly had such birds. Fanciers
who bought pigeons in the auctions later pretended to have 'Hofkensstrain',
even if it were pigeons that Hofkens did not breed himself or
pigeons which Hofkens bred off of birds he purchased himself
somewhere else.
JAN ARDEN:
a
famous name all over the world for long distance. Now, some
decades after his death many people in Holland claim to have
pure Jan Aarden strain. Most of them know better but the name
sells! And what again is the truth? Just like Hofkens Jan Aarden
was always looking for the best, he bought birds everywhere
and though he was not a very succesful racer it must be said
that later other fanciers were succesful with the offspring
of his pigeons.
But
they were not 'a strain' either. What he did have
was also a mixture of birds. Like I said before epecially the
American pigeonfanciers are very naive.
They show off with pure Bekaert, pure Wegge, pure
Verheye, pure Hansenne, pure Bricoux, pure
Huyskens van Riel, pure Genette etcetera.Names
completely unknown to the younger generation in Europe. For
example Wegge and Huyskens van Riel.
Wegge
and Huyskens van Riel. Wegges birds were auctioned in 1903! Again
the same story: They were nearly all crossings. Now almost a century
later some Americans claim to have them pure. Isn't it ridicoulous?
Huyskens van Riels pigeons are also kept pure in foreign countries.
However, Geroges, the son of Jef van Riel himself admits that
in his birds is not much blood left of his late father. And if
there would be one person in the world who could have Huyskens
van Riel strain it would be him.
But he is an honest man who does not want to misuse the name of
his father. Moreover
also his fathers pigeons which destroyed
the races in the late fourties and early fifties were products
of crossings. In 1946 Jef van Riel bought a round of eggs from
Jos van den Bosch.
He CROSSED these pigeons with his own and an explosion of superbirds
was the result. Names
So succesful racers, (the champions in Holland and Belgium) do
not care for strains and they no not care for NAMES either when
they want to buy. The press made the names and it is funny and
sad at the same time to see that even today certain people who
are completely unkown in Holland and Belgium as they mean nothing
as racers are famous all over the world.
They cannot show results but their strong point is that these
'paper tigers' know how to manipulate the media. They advertise,
they know what people abroad like: Strains, impressing pedigrees
and photos and they offer what people abroad like: Strains impressing
pedigrees and photos. But their business is good:
They sell! Because they have other qualities than breeding good
pigeons: They have a good nose for money! It is rather frustrating
for the real champions with the superbirds to see Japanese, Americans
and Taiwanese buying such 'paper birds'. Have you ever heard about
William Geerts? You sure have. Have you ever heard about an old
man called Fond Jacobs? Probably you have not. But it was the
birds of good old Fons Jacobs that made Geerts famous!
PUBLICITY
So what's the conclusion?
Very many champions in Holland and Belgium became famous with
pigeons they got from completely unknown fellowsportsmen. These
fellowsportsmen' are the real champions, unknown is they may be.
They do not advertise, they do not want to pay middlemen for publicity,
very often they do not even like publicity and they do not want
to pay exporters or importers to make them 'big shots' abroad.
Because money is not that important to them. What makes them happy
is good pigeons and good results. For those people the press can
go to hell. They want to win races, others may have the fame.
Moreover they can sell anyway. Not to foreigners but to fellow
sportsmen in their own country. Its the resultsheets that make
their publicity.
Mr X and his neighbour the Janssenman I would like to finish this
article with one more example which shows what I mean. There is
this Janssenman. A guy with many pigeons directly from Janssen
Bros. As a racer he means nothing but he is known all over the
world. Coincidentally his neighbour, let's call him Mr X, is a
great champion and hardly to beat in the races.
In fact he feels sorry about the poor results of the Janssenman
next door and he hopes every weekend this man will have a good
race. But in vain. The neighbour is just a loser. However
people from all over the world want the pigeons of this loser.
It often happens that they stop at the house of Mr X. They see
his loft 'so there must live a pigeonfancier' and they,stop there
to aks Mr X where the famous Janssenman lives. What such foreign
visitors do not realise is that not the Janssenman is the real
champion but the guy where they ask his address.
WHY? 'Why', I often wonder, do foreign pigeon people not
ask about results when buying birds? They want good results themselves
but when buying birds they want names and strains. And
not
to forget they want pigeons with special eyes: Colourful 'rich'
eyes, so-called breeding eyes.
Why do they like pigeons with rich eyes? I don't know. What I
do know however is that scientifically the eye means nothing.
Again in America pigeonpeople are crazy about 'eye-sign'. The
fact that we even do not have a Dutch word for 'eye-sign' means
enough. Good birds. That's what pigeonpeople all over the world
are after.
But if foreign buyers would know about the (poor!) results of
some famous European names their eyes would pop out. But their
eyes would even more pop out if they would know about the sensational
results of fanciers whose names are completely unknown to them!
Whose fault this all is? As I said before:
The media, the press!
One of the reasons that I said 'okay' when Mr Lin asked me
to write for him in this magazine is that I consider it as a duty
for every man who writes about pigeons and pigeonsport to open
the eyes of people who have been brainwashed too much in the past
in this materialistic world.
Ad
Schaerlaeckens
©
Ad Schaerlaeckens